Skip to main content

Edmunds Tested: Electric Car Range and Consumption

Real World vs. EPA

EV Plug

Latest Highlights

  • New Model 3 tested but falls short of its EPA-estimated range
  • Cybertruck is the first Tesla to beat Tesla's range estimates, but doesn't go as far as the Rivian R1T max pack or GMC Hummer EV
  • There are 36 EVs in Edmunds' 300-mile-plus club


What's On This Page?

  1. The Leaderboard: Best Real-World EV Range
  2. The Chart: Edmunds' EV Testing Data vs. EPA Estimates
Search EV tax credits and rebates in your area
See Electric Vehicle Rebates

Am I Ready for an EV?

  • EV ownership works best if you can charge (240V) at home or at work This typically means a 240V home installation, but you could also have a similar setup at your office or other places your car is already parked for several hours each day. Don't expect a regular household outlet (120V) to suffice unless you've got a plug-in hybrid, in which case overnight charging at home is feasible.
  • If you can’t charge at home, charging at a charging station could take at least 10x longer than at a gas station With public charging infrastructure still in its infancy, the user experience can be maddeningly inconsistent. Tesla owners tend to rave about the reliability and speed of the company's proprietary Supercharger stations, but rival DC fast options have thus far been plagued by technical issues and overcrowding. It's an evolving landscape and our best advice is to do your research on the available options for the EV you want to buy.
  • Adding a 240V home charging system could cost up to $1,600 or more If your existing electrical service can handle the additional demands of EV charging, you may be able to add Level 2 charging at home for less than a grand, including installation. But your costs will multiply if you need to upgrade your electrical panel or add a dedicated circuit.

EV Range Leaderboard

EPA estimate
Edmunds tested
#4
2023 GMC Hummer EV
329 mi
390 mi
#22
2024 Kia EV6 Wind RWD
310 mi
323 mi
#24
2024 BMW i5 eDrive40
270 mi
321 mi
#34
2024 Kia EV9 GT-Line
270 mi
306 mi
#39
2021 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro
260 mi
288 mi
#42
2022 Audi RS e-tron GT
232 mi
285 mi
#45
2023 Kia Niro EV
253 mi
280 mi
#46
2022 Chevrolet Bolt
259 mi
278 mi
#48
2022 Audi e-tron GT
238 mi
273 mi
#50
2022 Audi Q4 e-tron 50
241 mi
270 mi
#53
2022 BMW i4 M50
227 mi
268 mi
#60
2022 Porsche Taycan GTS
246 mi
259 mi
#63
2022 Volvo C40 Recharge
226 mi
252 mi
#66
2022 Audi e-tron
222 mi
248 mi
#68
2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge
208 mi
240 mi
#69
2023 Kia EV6 GT
206 mi
238 mi
#70
2022 Nissan Leaf Plus SL
215 mi
237 mi
#75
2023 MINI Cooper SE
114 mi
129 mi
#76
2022 Mazda MX-30
100 mi
114 mi

Updated March 29, 2024

The Chart: Edmunds' EV Testing Data vs. EPA Estimates

This chart shows an electric vehicle's official EPA range and energy consumption compared to the range and consumption results from Edmunds' own testing, which is designed to be a real-world complement to the EPA's laboratory-based process. If you see arrows in a column heading, click it to change the sort order.

EdmundsRangeConsumptionConditions
Vehicle
2022 Lucid Air Dream Range520 miles505 miles*
(-2.9%)
27 kWh/100 mi28.3 kWh/100 mi
(-4.8%)
67°
2022 Lucid Air Grand Touring (19-in wheels)516 miles465 miles*
(-9.9%)
26 kWh/100 mi28.4 kWh/100 mi
(-9.2%)
76°
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+350 miles422 miles*
(+20.6%)
35 kWh/100 mi29.5 kWh/100 mi
(+15.7%)
67°
2023 GMC Hummer EV329 miles390 miles*
(+18.4%)
na57.8 kWh/100 mi
(na)
61°
2023 Rivian R1T Performance Dual Motor (21-in. wheels)410 miles390 miles*
(-4.9%)
na42.3 kWh/100 mi
(na)
64°
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 580340 miles381 miles*
(+12.1%)
36 kWh/100 mi33 kWh/100 mi
(+8.3%)
62°
2022 BMW iX xDrive50 (22-in wheels)315 miles377 miles*
(+19.7%)
39 kWh/100 mi32.0 kWh/100 mi
(+18.0%)
73°
2023 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450+305 miles360 miles*
(+18.1%)
39 kWh/100 mi35.3 kWh/100 mi
(+9.6%)
64°
2023 Fisker Ocean Extreme One (22-in. wheels)360 miles358 miles*
(-0.6%)
37 kWh/100 mi35.4 kWh/100 mi
(+4.3%)
72°
2023 Ford F-150 Lightning Lariat320 miles345 miles*
(+7.8%)
48 kWh/100 mi43.7 kWh/100 mi
(+9.0%)
72°
2022 Tesla Model S Plaid (21-in wheels)348 miles345 miles*
(-0.9%)
33 kWh/ 100 mi32.1 kWh/ 100 mi
(+2.7%)
73°
2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350+279 miles345 miles*
(+23.7%)
37 kWh/100 mi30.3 kWh/100 mi
(+18.2%)
77°
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E California Route 1305 miles344 miles
(+12.8%)
33 kWh/100 mi28.9 kWh/100 mi
(+12.4%)
58°
2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Limited RWD361 miles343 miles*
(-5.1%)
24 kWh/100 mi24.2 kWh/100 mi
(-0.9%)
69°
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium Ext Range RWD300 miles341 miles
(+13.7%)
35 kWh/100 mi29.2 kWh/100 mi
(+16.6%)
63°
2024 Tesla Model 3 Long Range341 miles338 miles*
(-0.9%)
na25.3 kWh/100 mi
(na)
74°
2024 Tesla Cybertruck Foundation Series318 miles334 miles*
(-1.7%)
na45.1 kWh/100 mi
(na)
60°
2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Platinum Extended Range300 miles332 miles*
(+10.7%)
51 kWh/100 mi45.4 kWh/100 mi
(+11.0%)
81°
2022 Mercedes-Benz AMG EQS 53 4Matic277 miles332 miles*
(+19.9%)
44 kWh/100 mi38.7 kWh/100 mi
(+12.0%)
79°
2022 Rivian R1S Launch Edition316 miles330 miles*
(+4.6%)
49 kWh/100 mi47.4 kWh/100 mi
(+3.3%)
80°
2023 BMW iX M60 (22-inch wheels)274 miles325 miles*
(+18.6%)
43 kWh/100 mi37.4 kWh/100 mi
(+13.1%)
75°
2024 Kia EV6 Wind RWD310 miles323 miles*
(+4.2%)
28 kWh/100 mi26.0 kWh/100 mi
(+7.1%)
67°
2020 Porsche Taycan 4S (20-in wheels)203 miles323 miles*
(+59.3%)
49 kWh/100 mi32.3 kWh/100 mi
(+34.1%)
73°
2024 BMW i5 eDrive40270 miles321 miles*
(+19.0%)
35 kWh/100 mi28.7 kWh/100 mi
(+17.9%)
77°
2022 Rivian R1T Launch Edition314 miles321 miles*
(+2.2%)
48 kWh/100 mi47.0 kWh/100 mi
(+2.2%)
68°
2023 BMW i7 xDrive60 (21-inch wheels)308 miles320 miles*
(+3.8%)
39 kWh/100 mi35.5 kWh/100 mi
(+9%)
61°
2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV RS AWD279 miles320 miles*
(+14.6%)
35 kWh/100 mi31.1 kWh/100 mi
(+11.0%)
77°
2020 Tesla Model S Performance326 miles318 miles*
(-2.5%)
35 kWh/100 mi32.6 kWh/100 mi
(+6.9%)
60°
2021 Tesla Model Y Long Range326 miles317 miles*
(-2.8%)
27 kWh/100 mi26.2 kWh/100 mi
(+3.0%)
62°
2023 Genesis Electrified G80282 miles309 miles*
(+9.6%)
35 kWh/100 mi30.6 kWh/100 mi
(+12.6%)
74°
2022 Hyundai Kona Electric258 miles308 miles
(+21.9%)
28 kWh/100 mi23 kWh/100 mi
(+20.4%)
56°
2022 BMW i4 eDrive40 Gran Coupe (19-in wheels)270 miles307 miles*
(+13.8%)
34 kWh/100 mi29.3 kWh/100 mi
(+13.9%)
57°
2023 Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Ext Range290 miles307 miles
(+5.9%)
37 kWh/ \100 mi32.7 kWh/100 mi
(+11.7%)
62°
2024 Kia EV9 GT-Line270 miles306 miles*
(+13.4%)
42 kWh/100 mi35.7 kWh/100 mi
(+15.1%)
72°
2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Limited AWD270 miles303 miles*
(+12.3%)
33 kWh/100 mi27.5 kWh/100 mi
(+16.8%)
65°
2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE 350 4Matic260 miles302 miles*
(+16.0%)
42 kWh/100 mi34.4 kWh/100 mi
(+18.1%)
63°
2020 Tesla Model X Long Range328 miles294 miles*
(-10.4%)
35 kWh/100 mi35.0 kWh/100 mi
(0.0%)
60°
2022 Polestar 2 Long Range Single Motor270 miles289 miles*
(+7.0%)
31 kWh/100 mi30.1 kWh/100 mi
(+2.9%)
62°
2021 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro260 miles288 miles*
(+10.8%)
34 kWh/100 mi29.3 kWh/100 mi
(+13.9%)
65°
2021 Volkswagen ID.4 First Edition250 miles287 miles*
(+14.8%)
35 kWh/100 mi28.8 kWh/100 mi
(+17.7%)
63°
2022 Porsche Taycan (20-in wheels)225 miles286 miles*
(+27.1%)
45 kWh/100 mi35 kWh/100 mi
(+22.2%)
68°
2022 Audi RS e-tron GT232 miles285 miles*
(+22.8%)
42 kWh/ 100 mi36.4 kWh/ 100 mi
(+13.3%)
77°
2022 Kia EV6 GT-Line dual motor274 miles283 miles*
(+3.3%)
32 kWh/100 mi29.5 kWh/100 mi
(+7.8%)
66°
2023 Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor260 miles282 miles*
(+8.4%)
34 kWh/100 mi31.8 kWh/100 mi
(+6.5%)
67°
2023 Kia Niro EV253 miles280 miles
(+10.7%)
29 kWh/100 mi25.6 kWh/100 mi
(+11.7%)
68°
2022 Chevrolet Bolt259 miles278 miles
(+7.3%)
28 kWh/100 mi25.7 kWh/100 mi
(+8.2%)
71°
2023 Genesis GV60 Performance235 miles274 miles*
(+16.6%)
37 kWh/100 mi30.9 kWh/100 mi
(+16.5%)
76°
2022 Audi e-tron GT238 miles273 miles*
(+14.7%)
41 kWh/100 mi37.2 kWh/100 mi
(+9.3%)
70°
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance260 miles272 miles
(+4.6%)
41 kWh/100 mi37.4 kWh/100 mi
(+8.8%)
68°
2022 Audi Q4 e-tron 50241 miles270 miles*
(+12.0%)
36 kWh/100 mi31.3 kWh/100 mi
(+13.1%)
71°
2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited dual motor256 miles270 miles*
(+5.5%)
34 kWh/100 mi30.9 kWh/100 mi
(+9.1%)
55°
2023 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S dual motor255 miles269 miles*
(+5.3%)
34 kWh/100 mi31.4 kWh/100 mi
(+7.7%)
62°
2022 BMW i4 M50227 miles268 miles*
(+18.1%)
42 kWh/100 mi34.1 kWh/100 mi
(+18.8%)
75°
2022 Chevrolet Bolt EUV Premier247 miles265 miles
(+7.3%)
29 kWh/100 mi26.7 kWh/100 mi
(+7.9%)
78°
2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Pro230 miles265 miles*
(+15.2%)
49 kWh/100 mi41.3 kWh/100 mi
(+15.7%)
72°
2023 Nissan Ariya Platinum+ e-4orce257 miles265 miles*
(+3.1%)
39 kWh/100 mi36.3 kWh/100 mi
(+6.8%)
63°
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Std. Range230 miles264 miles
(+14.8%)
34 kWh/ 100 mi29.2 kWh/ 100 mi
(+14.1%)
62°
2020 Tesla Model Y Performance291 miles263 miles*
(-9.6%)
30 kWh/100 mi29.6 kWh/100 mi
(+1.3%)
65°
2022 Jaguar I-Pace EV400 HSE234 miles262 miles
(+12.0%)
44 kWh/100 mi36.3 kWh/100 mi
(+17.5%)
67°
2022 Porsche Taycan GTS246 miles259 miles*
(+5.3%)
41 kWh/100 mi38.2 kWh/100 mi
(+6.8%)
77°
2018 Tesla Model 3 Performance310 miles256 miles*
(-17.4%)
29 kWh/100 mi30.1 kWh/100 mi
(-3.8%)
61°
2023 Genesis Electrified GV70 AWD Prestige236 miles255 miles*
(+7.9%)
37 kWh/100 mi33.0 kWh/100 mi
(+10.9%)
68°
2022 Volvo C40 Recharge226 miles252 miles
(+11.5%)
39 kWh/100 mi35.1 kWh/100 mi
(+10.0%)
74°
2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG EQE225 miles251 miles*
(+11.7%)
46 kWh/100 mi38.0 kWh/100 mi
(+17.4%)
58°
2022 Porsche Taycan 4S Cross Turismo (21-in wheels)215 miles250 miles*
(+16.3%)
45 kWh/100 mi39.2 kWh/100 miles
(+12.9%)
66°
2022 Audi e-tron222 miles248 miles*
(+11.7%)
43 kWh/100 mi38.4 kWh/100 miles
(+10.7%)
67°
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350227 miles242 miles*
(+6.6%)
35 kWh/100 mi32.2 kWh/100 mi
(+8.0%)
70°
2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge208 miles240 miles*
(+15.4%)
43 kWh/100 mi35.4 kWh/100 miles
(+17.7%)
70°
2023 Kia EV6 GT206 miles238 miles*
(+15.3%)
42 kWh/100 mi35.2 kWh/100 mi
(+16.3%)
61°
2022 Nissan Leaf Plus SL215 miles237 miles
(+10.2%)
32 kWh/100 mi27.1 kWh/100 mi
(+15.3%)
67°
2020 Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus250 miles232 miles*
(-7.2%)
24 kWh/100 mi23.0 kWh/100 mi
(+4.2%)
67°
2023 Toyota bZ4X Limited FWD242 miles227 miles
(-6.2%)
26 kWh/100 mi28.5 kWh/100 mi
(-9.6%)
65°
2023 Lexus RZ450e (20-in wheels)196 miles204 miles*
(+4.1%)
36 kWh/100 mi30.7 kWh/100 mi
(+14.7%)
57°
2020 Hyundai Ioniq Electric170 miles202 miles
(+18.9%)
25 kWh/100 mi20.8 kWh/100 mi
(+16.8%)
70°
2023 MINI Cooper SE114 miles129 miles
(+13.3%)
31 kWh/ 100 mi25.3 kWh/ 100 mi
(+18.3%)
60°
2022 Mazda MX-30100 miles114 miles
(+14.0%)
37 kWh/100 mi29.6 kWh/100 mi
(+20.0%)
55°

*Range tested at maximum battery charge to align with EPA estimates. Manufacturer recommends a lower battery charge level for daily use to preserve battery life.

What is EPA estimated range?

In short, this is the approximate number of miles that a vehicle can travel in combined city and highway driving (using a mix of 55% highway and 45% city driving) before needing to be recharged, according to the EPA's testing methodology.

But what exactly is that methodology? First, the vehicle is fully charged and parked overnight. The following day, the vehicle is driven on a dynamometer — it's like a treadmill for cars — over successive simulated city and highway routes until the battery is depleted. The total distance traveled is then multiplied by a correction factor that the EPA has determined will more accurately reflect what drivers can expect to achieve in the real world. The value of this correction factor, which is always less than 1 but greater than 0, is determined by the number of drive cycles a vehicle is tested on.

In short, there's certainly a method to the EPA's madness, but the process is laboratory-based, and EV owners don't drive their cars in a lab. So what's the real-world version? That's where Edmunds' EV range testing comes in.

What is EPA estimated consumption?

Akin to miles per gallon (mpg) for fuel-burning vehicles, this metric represents electric vehicles' energy consumption in kilowatt-hours per hundred miles (kWh/100 miles). A battery stores energy in kilowatt-hours much like a gas tank stores fuel in gallons. This value tells you how much energy in kilowatt-hours a vehicle would use to travel 100 miles.

Unlike mpg, however, where a larger number is better (for example, a vehicle that gets 30 mpg is better than one that gets 20 mpg), a smaller number is better in kWh/100 miles because you are using less battery energy per mile. So a vehicle that uses 20 kWh/100 miles is more efficient than one that uses 30 kWh/100 miles.

In EPA testing, once a vehicle battery is depleted, it is recharged using the manufacturer-supplied charger for that vehicle. The energy consumption is then determined mathematically from the recharging energy, the energy-discharge data from the vehicle, and the distance traveled for each cycle. The recharge energy includes any charging losses due to inefficiencies in the manufacturer’s charger.

What is Edmunds tested range?

Edmunds begins with full battery charge and drives an electric vehicle on a mix of city and highway roads (approximately 60% city, 40% highway) until the battery is almost entirely empty. (We target 10 miles of remaining range for safety.) The miles traveled and the indicated remaining range are added together for the Edmunds total tested range figure. We prefer to use a higher percentage of city road driving because we believe it's more representative of typical EV use.

What is Edmunds tested consumption?

After a vehicle completes its road loop and the battery is nearly empty, it's charged back to full capacity. The kilowatt-hours used from plug-in to a full charge are tracked and then we calculate the consumption based on the miles traveled (less the remaining range). This process takes into account charging losses in the Edmunds tested consumption number.

What is Range % difference EPA vs. Edmunds?

This figure is the difference between the EPA's range estimate and the range tested in Edmunds' real-world testing. A positive percentage (in green) means Edmunds exceeded the range estimated by the EPA, while a negative percentage (in red) means a vehicle fell short of its EPA range during our test.

What is Consumption % difference EPA vs. Edmunds?

This figure is the difference between the EPA's energy consumption estimate and the energy consumption Edmunds calculated based on our real-world testing. A positive percentage (in green) means a vehicle used that much less energy than its EPA estimate and was more efficient in Edmunds' testing. A negative percentage (in red) means a vehicle used that much more energy than its EPA estimate and was less efficient in Edmunds' testing. Remember, a lower kWh/100 miles number is better if you're talking EVs.

What is ambient temperature and why does it matter?

Ambient temperature — how cold or hot it is outside — matters a whole lot when it comes to electric vehicle range, so we list the daily average temperature on the day of testing. California, and more specifically Los Angeles, has one of the more temperate climates in the world, which helps keep our testing conditions relatively consistent throughout the year. But since we can't control the weather, we thought we'd at least report it.

How does Edmunds conduct its testing?

The roads

Edmunds drives on specific road routes that cover both highway and city driving around the greater Los Angeles area. We aim for a mix of 60% city driving and 40% highway, assuming that most electric vehicle owners will likely spend more time in stop-and-go traffic than they will on the open highway. Since no electric vehicle has exactly the same range, the route length is adapted to suit each vehicle.

The methodology

In EPA tests, a vehicle is run in the default settings at startup. If there are more efficient drive modes available, or if you can increase the level of regenerative braking, but the vehicle doesn't default to these settings, they won't be utilized. Edmunds' standard practice is to use the most efficient drive mode as long as it doesn't affect safety or practical comfort levels, such as deactivating the climate control system or significantly reducing power for accelerating or maintaining appropriate highway speeds.

We run with windows up and the climate control set to auto at 72 degrees, and we maximize regenerative braking during stops. We follow the posted speed limits and keep within 5 mph of them, traffic and conditions permitting.

Which number is more accurate, EPA or Edmunds?

The short answer is neither. So many factors contribute to how far an electric vehicle will travel on a single charge that to come up with a single figure for every situation is impossible. The EPA's testing is highly controlled and standardized, but as we've found in our testing, the real-world correlation can vary dramatically depending on the vehicle.

Because Edmunds' testing uses a more conservative driving style and puts greater emphasis on city driving over highway driving (compared to the EPA's mix), our figures will often be on the higher end for range, which usually equates to better efficiency. But that's not always the case. Overall, our figures are intended to provide EV owners and potential customers with an additional data point so that they can make more informed decisions.

To date, every Tesla vehicle we've run on our real-world test route has failed to hit its EPA range estimate within the testing parameters described above, whereas most non-Tesla vehicles have surpassed their EPA estimates. Please refer to the chart above for our full test results.